PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://gendermore.unimore.it/handle/123456789/1575

Browse

Settings

Discipline: search.filters.discipline.Women in MathSubject: search.filters.subject.International

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item type:Publication,
    The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Open PDF 
    (2018)
    Stoet, Gijsbert
    ;
    Geary, David C.
    The underrepresentation of girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields is a continual concern for social scientists and policymakers. Using an international database on adolescent achievement in science, mathematics, and reading ( N = 472,242), we showed that girls performed similarly to or better than boys in science in two of every three countries, and in nearly all countries, more girls appeared capable of college-level STEM study than had enrolled. Paradoxically, the sex differences in the magnitude of relative academic strengths and pursuit of STEM degrees rose with increases in national gender equality. The gap between boys' science achievement and girls' reading achievement relative to their mean academic performance was near universal. These sex differences in academic strengths and attitudes toward science correlated with the STEM graduation gap. A mediation analysis suggested that life-quality pressures in less gender-equal countries promote girls' and women's engagement with STEM subjects.
  • Item type:Publication,
    A global approach to the gender gap in mathematical, computing and natural sciences: How to measure it, how to reduce it? Open PDF 
    (Academy of Science of South Africa, 2019)
    Gledhill, I.M.A.
    ;
    Roy, M.-F.
    ;
    Chiu, M.-H.
    ;
    Ivie, R.
    ;
    Ponce-Dawson, S.
    The participation of women in many fields of science remains a subject of concern worldwide. In this Commentary, we describe one of three collaborative projects – the Gender Gap project – funded by the International Science Council (ISC) and the 11 partners of the project. This project is the only one of the three that addresses an issue of such relevance for society. The objectives of the project are to provide evidence on which interventions can be based, and to make available material on best practice that has been proven by test. The project includes a joint global survey and a bibliometric analysis, both of which have an emphasis on comparing and contrasting results from less developed countries and from more developed countries.