New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
Who We Are✱Collections✱News and Events✱Contacts
  1. Home
  2. PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION
  3. Journal Article
  4. Exploring parity in female authorship of pharmacoepidemiology articles: A case study of the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies and its citing articles
Details

Exploring parity in female authorship of pharmacoepidemiology articles: A case study of the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies and its citing articles

Publication type
journal article
Publication date
2022
Author(s)
Sketris, I.S.
Traynor, R.L.
Helwig, M.
Burland, E.
Stewart, S.A.
Language
English
Keywords

Authorship

Bibliometrics

Gender Equity

Research Impact

Knowledge

Pharmacoepidemiology

View point(s)
Institutional
Discipline(s)

Epidemiology

Pharmacy

Geographical area

Canada

Abstract
Purpose: The Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES) studies the benefits and risks of post-market drugs and evaluates its research mobilization efforts for accountability, demonstrating value, and learning. As part of these evaluation efforts, and acknowledging gender disparity in authorship across many academic disciplines, CNODES examined the relationship between gender and authorship in its own journal articles and the literature citing them. Methods: CNODES articles (published 2012–2017) and all citing articles were identified and extracted using Scopus. Scopus author IDs were used to extract full names and a web service (www.genderapi.com) was used to estimate gender, converting all probabilities <80% to “indeterminate.” T-tests and visualizations were used to compare the proportion of females between CNODES and the citing literature. Results: Twenty-eight CNODES articles and 463 citing articles were identified. The mean number of authors per article was 9.5 in CNODES articles and 5.7 in the citing literature. CNODES articles had a female authorship rate of 36%, compared to 29% in the citing literature (7% difference, 95% CI: [1%, 13%]). There were no female authors in 14% of CNODES articles versus 36% of the citing literature. Women were first authors in 25% and corresponding authors in 14% of CNODES articles. Conclusions: This analysis provides a benchmark and method to monitor progress in female parity in pharmacoepidemiology authorship. Further work is needed to determine and address barriers and facilitators to women's recruitment and advancement in the field of pharmacoepidemiology. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Journal
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
ISSN
1053-8569
DOI
10.1002/pds.5364
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pagination
82-90
https://libkey.io/libraries/2561/articles/499953231/full-text-file?utm_source=api_2667&allow_speedbump=true
Repository logo
Sistema Bibliotecariodi Ateneo SBA
gendermore@unimore.it
www.sba.unimore.it
Privacy policy
End User Agreement
Send Feedback

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
Repository logo COAR Notify