New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
Who We Are✱Collections✱News and Events✱Contacts
  1. Home
  2. PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION
  3. Journal Article
  4. Overcoming the gender bias in ecology and evolution: is the double-anonymized peer review an effective pathway over time?
Details

Overcoming the gender bias in ecology and evolution: is the double-anonymized peer review an effective pathway over time?

Publication type
journal article
Publication date
2023
Author(s)
Cassia-Silva, C
Rocha, BS
Lievano-Latorre, LF
Sobreiro, MB
Diele-Viegas, LM
Language
English
Keywords

COVID-19

Inclusion

Double-blind

Gender Diversity

Gender Equality

Impact

Journals

Masking Author Identi...

Triple-anonymized Pol...

Women

View point(s)
Global
PhD Level
Discipline(s)

Engineering

General Medicine

Technology

Abstract
Male researchers dominate scientific production in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, potential mechanisms to avoid this gender imbalance remain poorly explored in STEM, including ecology and evolution areas. In the last decades, changes in the peer-review process towards double-anonymized (DA) have increased among ecology and evolution (EcoEvo) journals. Using comprehensive data on articles from 18 selected EcoEvo journals with an impact factor >1, we tested the effect of the DA peer-review process in female-leading (i.e., first and senior authors) articles. We tested whether the representation of female-leading authors differs between double and single-anonymized (SA) peer-reviewed journals. Also, we tested if the adoption of the DA by previous SA journals has increased the representativeness of female-leading authors over time. We found that publications led by female authors did not differ between DA and SA journals. Moreover, female-leading articles did not increase after changes from SA to DA peer-review. Tackling female underrepresentation in science is a complex task requiring many interventions. Still, our results highlight that adopting the DA peer-review system alone could be insufficient in fostering gender equality in EcoEvo scientific publications. Ecologists and evolutionists understand how diversity is important to ecosystems' resilience in facing environmental changes. The question remaining is: why is it so difficult to promote and keep this "diversity" in addition to equity and inclusion in the academic environment? We thus argue that all scientists, mentors, and research centers must be engaged in promoting solutions to gender bias by fostering diversity, inclusion, and affirmative measures.
Journal
PEERJ
ISSN
2167-8359
DOI
10.7717/peerj.15186
Volume
11
Pagination
e15186
https://libkey.io/libraries/2561/articles/566318134/full-text-file?utm_source=api_2667&allow_speedbump=true
Repository logo
Sistema Bibliotecariodi Ateneo SBA
gendermore@unimore.it
www.sba.unimore.it
Privacy policy
End User Agreement
Send Feedback

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
Repository logo COAR Notify