New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logoRepository logo
Who We Are✱Collections✱News and Events✱Contacts
  1. Home
  2. PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION
  3. Journal Article
  4. Research Conducted in Women Was Deemed More Impactful but Less Publishable than the Same Research Conducted in Men
Details

Research Conducted in Women Was Deemed More Impactful but Less Publishable than the Same Research Conducted in Men

Publication type
journal article
Publication date
2021
Author(s)
Murrar, Sohad
Johnson, Paula A.
Lee, You-Geon
Carnes, Molly
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
Language
English
Keywords

Academic Medicine

Equity

Gender

Peer Review

View point(s)
Global
Peer Review System
Geographical area

USA

Abstract
Background: Female scientists, who are more likely than their male counterparts to study women and report findings by sex/gender, fare worse in the article peer review process. It is unknown whether the gender of research participants influences the recommendation to publish an article describing the study. Materials and Methods: Reviewers were randomly assigned to evaluate one of three versions of an article abstract describing a clinical study conducted in men, women, or individuals. Reviewers assessed the study's scientific rigor, its level of contribution to medical science, and whether they would recommend publishing the full article. Responses were analyzed with logistic regression controlling for reviewer background variables, including sex and experience level. Results: There was no significant difference in perceived research rigor by abstract condition; contribution to medical science was perceived to be greater for research conducted in women than men (odds ratio = 1.7; p = 0.030). Nevertheless, reviewers were almost twice as likely to recommend publication for research conducted in men than the same research conducted in women (predicted probability 0.606 vs. 0.322; p = 0.000). Conclusions: These results are consistent with abundant data from multiple sources showing a lower societal value placed on women than men. Because female investigators are more likely than male investigators to study women, our findings suggest a previously unrecognized bias that could contribute to gender asymmetries in the publication outcomes of peer review. This pro-male publication bias could be an additional barrier to leadership attainment for women in academic medicine and the advancement of women's health.
Journal
Journal of Women's Health
ISSN
1540-9996
DOI
10.1089/jwh.2020.8666
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pagination
1259-1267
URL
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jwh.2020.8666
https://libkey.io/libraries/2561/articles/450442542/full-text-file?utm_source=api_2667&allow_speedbump=true
Repository logo
Sistema Bibliotecariodi Ateneo SBA
gendermore@unimore.it
www.sba.unimore.it
Privacy policy
End User Agreement
Send Feedback

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
Repository logo COAR Notify