PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://gendermore.unimore.it/handle/123456789/1575

Browse

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.InclusionViewpoints: search.filters.viewpoints.PhD Level

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item type:Publication,
    Fostering trustworthy dialogue on race, ethnicity and gender in a mentoring and leadership program for academic medicine faculty Open PDF 
    (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025-12-30)
    Pololi, Linda
    ;
    Brimhall-Vargas, Mark
    ;
    Mojto, Alison Milofsky
    Background Inequity and marginalization of faculty historically underrepresented in academic medicine persist. As medical schools seek to increase the diversity and success of all their faculty, there is a need for effective change activities to address racism and sexism in medicine. We present an evaluation of an exercise aimed at enhancing cross-cultural awareness and valuing of diversity that was embedded in a faculty mentoring and leadership program in academic medicine. Most cross-cultural training fails to include opportunity to practice these difficult conversations in a diverse group. Methods Participants were 80 MD and PhD multidisciplinary medical school faculty who participated in five implementations of the yearlong C-Change Mentoring and Leadership Institute between 2018 and 2023. 43% of faculty were from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, 60% were female, 65% were physicians and 35% had a PhD degree. We conducted a qualitative analysis of written and oral faculty responses to a collection of verbatim quotations of underrepresented minority and female faculty that described experiences of being discriminated against in the workplace. Thematic analysis of written and oral data was inductive, allowing themes to emerge from the data. Results Themes that emerged in the data from these facilitated conversations were: increased awareness of racism, recognition of lack of knowledge; connection, shared experience, and empathy; blame, judgment, dismissiveness, and deflection; focus on solutions/paths for change; the nature of prejudice; and reflection on their role in the system. The themes in participant responses illustrated the developmental stages of identity awareness in White and underrepresented minority persons. Participating faculty were able to productively engage in difficult conversations across race, ethnicity and gender. Conclusions The facilitated exercise engendered reflection, dialogue and learning about racism, sexism and identity development. Such exercises can open spaces of possibility for change at the individual level as well as the creation of inclusive cultures necessary for systemic change to occur.
  • Item type:Publication,
    Gender and racial/ethnic disparities in rates of publishing and inclusion in scientific-review processes. Open PDF 
    (Educational Publishing Foundation, 2021)
    Willis, Malachi
    ;
    Bridges, Ana J.
    ;
    Jozkowski, Kristen N.
    Sexism and racism in academia have contributed to women and people of color being underrepresented at increasing levels of the academic hierarchy. We investigated whether people with socially marginalized identities experience disparities regarding rates of publishing and inclusion in the scientific-review process. Using a sample of academics in psychology departments at research-focused universities in the United States (<i>n</i> = 885), we found gender disparities for PhD holders and racial/ethnic disparities for graduate students. Specifically, female PhD holders and graduate students of color reported fewer publications and were less likely to be included in the scientific-review process compared with male PhD holders and White graduate students, respectively. Differences in research activity by gender and race/ethnicity in a contemporary sample of psychologists reflected a 'leaky pipeline' that persists in psychology departments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
  • Item type:Publication,
    Overcoming the gender bias in ecology and evolution: is the double-anonymized peer review an effective pathway over time? Open PDF 
    (2023)
    Cassia-Silva, C
    ;
    Rocha, BS
    ;
    Lievano-Latorre, LF
    ;
    Sobreiro, MB
    ;
    Diele-Viegas, LM
    Male researchers dominate scientific production in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, potential mechanisms to avoid this gender imbalance remain poorly explored in STEM, including ecology and evolution areas. In the last decades, changes in the peer-review process towards double-anonymized (DA) have increased among ecology and evolution (EcoEvo) journals. Using comprehensive data on articles from 18 selected EcoEvo journals with an impact factor >1, we tested the effect of the DA peer-review process in female-leading (i.e., first and senior authors) articles. We tested whether the representation of female-leading authors differs between double and single-anonymized (SA) peer-reviewed journals. Also, we tested if the adoption of the DA by previous SA journals has increased the representativeness of female-leading authors over time. We found that publications led by female authors did not differ between DA and SA journals. Moreover, female-leading articles did not increase after changes from SA to DA peer-review. Tackling female underrepresentation in science is a complex task requiring many interventions. Still, our results highlight that adopting the DA peer-review system alone could be insufficient in fostering gender equality in EcoEvo scientific publications. Ecologists and evolutionists understand how diversity is important to ecosystems' resilience in facing environmental changes. The question remaining is: why is it so difficult to promote and keep this "diversity" in addition to equity and inclusion in the academic environment? We thus argue that all scientists, mentors, and research centers must be engaged in promoting solutions to gender bias by fostering diversity, inclusion, and affirmative measures.