PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://gendermore.unimore.it/handle/123456789/1575

Browse

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.FacultyViewpoints: search.filters.viewpoints.PhD Level

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item type:Publication,
    Fostering trustworthy dialogue on race, ethnicity and gender in a mentoring and leadership program for academic medicine faculty Open PDF 
    (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025-12-30)
    Pololi, Linda
    ;
    Brimhall-Vargas, Mark
    ;
    Mojto, Alison Milofsky
    Background Inequity and marginalization of faculty historically underrepresented in academic medicine persist. As medical schools seek to increase the diversity and success of all their faculty, there is a need for effective change activities to address racism and sexism in medicine. We present an evaluation of an exercise aimed at enhancing cross-cultural awareness and valuing of diversity that was embedded in a faculty mentoring and leadership program in academic medicine. Most cross-cultural training fails to include opportunity to practice these difficult conversations in a diverse group. Methods Participants were 80 MD and PhD multidisciplinary medical school faculty who participated in five implementations of the yearlong C-Change Mentoring and Leadership Institute between 2018 and 2023. 43% of faculty were from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, 60% were female, 65% were physicians and 35% had a PhD degree. We conducted a qualitative analysis of written and oral faculty responses to a collection of verbatim quotations of underrepresented minority and female faculty that described experiences of being discriminated against in the workplace. Thematic analysis of written and oral data was inductive, allowing themes to emerge from the data. Results Themes that emerged in the data from these facilitated conversations were: increased awareness of racism, recognition of lack of knowledge; connection, shared experience, and empathy; blame, judgment, dismissiveness, and deflection; focus on solutions/paths for change; the nature of prejudice; and reflection on their role in the system. The themes in participant responses illustrated the developmental stages of identity awareness in White and underrepresented minority persons. Participating faculty were able to productively engage in difficult conversations across race, ethnicity and gender. Conclusions The facilitated exercise engendered reflection, dialogue and learning about racism, sexism and identity development. Such exercises can open spaces of possibility for change at the individual level as well as the creation of inclusive cultures necessary for systemic change to occur.
  • Item type:Publication,
    Does Gender Bias Still Affect Women in Science? Open PDF 
    (2019)
    Roper, Rachel L.
    The percentage of women employed in professional scientific positions has been low but is increasing over time. The U.S. National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have both implemented programs to improve women's participation in science, and many universities and companies have diversity and equity programs. While most faculty and scientists believe that they are fair and unbiased, numerous well-designed studies published in leading peer-reviewed journals show that gender bias in sciences and medicine is widespread and persistent today in both faculty and students. Recent studies show that gender bias affects student grading, professional hiring, mentoring, tenure, promotion, respect, grant proposal success, and pay. In addition, sexual harassment remains a significant barrier. Fortunately, several studies provide evidence that programs that raise conscious awareness of gender bias can improve equity in science, and there are a number of recommendations and strategies for improving the participation of women.
  • Item type:Publication,
    Analysis of Sex Diversity Trends Among Ophthalmology Match Applicants, Residents, and Clinical Faculty Open PDF 
    (2021)
    Aguwa, Ugochi T.
    ;
    Srikumaran, Divya
    ;
    Green, Laura K.
    ;
    Potts, John R.
    ;
    Canner, Joseph
    IMPORTANCE: The proportion of women in the field of ophthalmology in the US trails the proportion of women in the general population. Sex diversity trends have been studied in other specialties, but there is a dearth of such literature in ophthalmology. OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends in the proportion of female ophthalmology match applicants, residents, and clinical faculty. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study examined data from the San Francisco Match, the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, and American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019. Data from ophthalmology match applicants, residents, clinical faculty at US medical schools, and AAO members were collected. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The proportion of female applicants, residents, and medical school clinical faculty in ophthalmology. RESULTS: Data were obtained from a total of 2807 ophthalmology applicants (35.3% female), 1 004 563 residents (43.8% female), 463 079 clinical faculty members (42.5% female), and 78 968 AAO members (26.1% female). Male ophthalmology residency applicants outnumbered female applicants by a ratio of 1.6:1 from 2016 to 2019. The percentage of female matched applicants in 2016 (41% [168/406]) and 2019 (42% [184/436]) differed by 1% (percent change, 0.99; 95% CI, -1.12 to 3.1; P = .36). There was a 2.3% increase (percent change, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24-0.43; P < .001) in the percentage of female residents across all surgical specialties from 2011 (39.7% [8710/21 985]) to 2019 (42% [10 951/26 082]) but a 2.5% decrease (percent change, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.84 to -0.06; P = .02) in the percentage of female residents in ophthalmology from 2011 (41.5% [589/1419]) to 2019 (39% [575/1473]). The percentage of female ophthalmology clinical faculty differed by 2% (percent change, 1.02; 95% CI, -0.21 to 2.24; P = .10) from 2017 (38% [1179/3102]) to 2019 (40% [1225/3060]). From 2016 to 2019, male practicing ophthalmologists in the AAO outnumbered female practicing ophthalmologists by a ratio of 3:1. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that the percentage of women in the field of ophthalmology remains lower than percentages in other specialties, and the percentage of female ophthalmology residents has decreased in recent years. More efforts are needed to improve female representation in ophthalmology.