PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://gendermore.unimore.it/handle/123456789/1575

Browse

Settings

Geographical Area: search.filters.geographical.AsiaSubject: search.filters.subject.Physicians

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item type:Publication,
    The inverted gender pyramid in career progression among GCC physicians: implications for health workforce policy Open PDF 
    (Frontiers Media SA, 2026-05-22)
    Alzayani, Salman
    ;
    Al-Roomi, Khaldoon
    ;
    Almarabheh, Amer
    ;
    Hamdi, Ali M.
    INTRODUCTION: Gender equity in the health workforce is central to health systems policy and planning. In the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, women constitute most of medical graduates, yet their representation at advanced medical career levels is lower than men, reflecting an inverted gender pyramid. Quantitative evidence across GCC countries remains limited. We examined the gender differences in physicians' career progression among medical graduates of a regional medical school serving multiple GCC countries. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analysis was conducted using a pre-existing dataset of medical graduates from the College of Medicine and Health Sciences at Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain. Eligible records required gender, nationality, career level, and years since graduation. The sample included 685 graduates. Career progression was defined as advanced versus entry or mid-career level. Characteristics were compared by gender in bivariate analysis using chi square tests. In addition, adjusted odds ratios were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Females comprised most of the medical graduates (57.7%). However, male physicians more frequently achieved advanced career levels than their female counterparts (50.3% vs. 43.0%, p = 0.027), with no significant gender differences in career years (p = 0.518). In adjusted logistic regression model, male physicians had higher odds of attaining advanced career progression compared with females (OR 2.253, 95% CI 1.377-3.686, p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: An inverted gender pyramid was apparent, with women overrepresented among medical graduates but underrepresented among advanced medical career levels. The pattern is consistent with growing international evidence of gender inequities in the medical profession. There is an urgent need for health policy action that improves promotion transparency and formalizes leadership pipeline progression.INTRODUCTION: Gender equity in the health workforce is central to health systems policy and planning. In the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, women constitute most of medical graduates, yet their representation at advanced medical career levels is lower than men, reflecting an inverted gender pyramid. Quantitative evidence across GCC countries remains limited. We examined the gender differences in physicians' career progression among medical graduates of a regional medical school serving multiple GCC countries. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational analysis was conducted using a pre-existing dataset of medical graduates from the College of Medicine and Health Sciences at Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain. Eligible records required gender, nationality, career level, and years since graduation. The sample included 685 graduates. Career progression was defined as advanced versus entry or mid-career level. Characteristics were compared by gender in bivariate analysis using chi square tests. In addition, adjusted odds ratios were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Females comprised most of the medical graduates (57.7%). However, male physicians more frequently achieved advanced career levels than their female counterparts (50.3% vs. 43.0%, p = 0.027), with no significant gender differences in career years (p = 0.518). In adjusted logistic regression model, male physicians had higher odds of attaining advanced career progression compared with females (OR 2.253, 95% CI 1.377-3.686, p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: An inverted gender pyramid was apparent, with women overrepresented among medical graduates but underrepresented among advanced medical career levels. The pattern is consistent with growing international evidence of gender inequities in the medical profession. There is an urgent need for health policy action that improves promotion transparency and formalizes leadership pipeline progression.
  • Item type:Publication,
    Breaking the Gender Gap: A Two-part Observational Study of the Gender Disparity Among Korean Academic Emergency Physicians Open PDF 
    (2020)
    Lee, Mi Jin
    ;
    Kim, ChangHo
    OBJECTIVES: Despite greater access to training positions and the presence of more women in emergency medicine, it has remained a men-dominated field. This study aims to identify the key issues causing the gender gap in Korea and establish measures to overcome them. METHODS: Using the annual statistical reports of the National Emergency Medical Center and data published on the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine website, cases that listed the current status and positions of members in its organization and its committees were analyzed. Secondary analysis was conducted using data from the 2015 Korean Society of Emergency Survey that included physicians' demographics, academic ranking, years of experience, clinical work hours, training and board certification, core faculty status, position, and salaries. RESULTS: As of September 2019, women account for only 12.7% of the total number of emergency physicians (EP) in Korea; of 119 chair/ vice-chair academic positions, women represented only 9.2%. Women EP were more often assistant professors and fellowship-trained, with fewer in core faculty. However, they worked the same numbers of clinical hours as their men counterparts. The median annual salary of women EP was less than that of men EP after adjusting for academic hospital rank, clinical hours, and core faculty status. CONCLUSIONS: A gender gap still exists among Korean EP, and women earn less than men regardless of their rank, clinical hours, or training. Future studies should evaluate more data and develop system-wide practices to eliminate gender disparities.