PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://gendermore.unimore.it/handle/123456789/1575

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Item type:Publication,
    A study of factors inhibiting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI Open PDF 
    (2013)
    Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A.
    ;
    Hasanzadeh, M.
    Because in terms of research productivity, performance of women is weaker than men's, and since little is known on the factors inhibiting academic women's productivity in Iran, the present article aims to study factors inhibiting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI. To do this, at first, women who have already had published documents indexed in ISI were identified through web of science (WoS). Afterwards, in order to collect their view regarding factors inhibiting women's research productivity, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. To analyze the collected data, the statistical software SPSS (version 17) was used. Both descriptive (percentage and frequency) and inferential (ANOVA) statistics were employed to reach valid findings. The findings indicate that the most inhibitory factors affecting negatively publishing scholarly articles by Iranian women are 'Shortcomings in the existing laws', 'Stereotypes and beliefs concerning women', 'Family work', 'Social and cultural contingencies', 'Child care', and 'Low collaboration with male colleagues'. Finally, some remarks for the improvement of the current condition are highlighted. © 2013 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Item type:Publication,
    A study of factors affecting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI Open PDF 
    (2012)
    Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A.
    ;
    Hasanzadeh, M.
    ;
    Ghayoori, Z.
    Based on the fact that in terms of research productivity, performance of women is weaker than men's, and because little is known on the factors affecting academic women's productivity in Iran, the present article aims to study factors affecting research productivity of Iranian women in ISI. To do this, at first, women who have already had published documents indexed in ISI were identified through Web of Science. Afterwards, in order to collect their view regarding factors affecting women's research productivity, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. To analyze the collected data, the statistical software SPSS (version 17) was used. Both descriptive (Percentage and Frequency) and inferential (ANOVA) statistics were employed to reach valid findings. The findings indicate that the most motivational factors affecting positively publishing scholarly articles by Iranian women are 'Getting promoted in scientific rank', 'Intrinsic talents', 'Perseverance and adventitious knowledge', 'Feeling of being useful in society', 'Getting promoted in job', 'Being encouraged by friends and family', 'Religious lessons regarding the importance of science', and 'Attempt to show individual capabilities'. Finally, some remarks for the improvement of the current condition are highlighted. © 2011 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Item type:Publication,
    Gender Influence on Authorship Pattern: A Case Study Open PDF 
    (2023)
    Singh Deo, P.
    ;
    Hangsing, P.
    Little is known about the existing gender disparities in library and information science research. The current study aims to analyze research articles from the Annals of Library and information studies journal from a gender perspective. The study looked at the author’s position in relation to their gender, various patterns of collaboration, and if this has affected citations. This study also attempts to determine the male and female authors’ research interests as the first author. The data were gathered from the Scopus database between 2011 and 2019 and were quantified using bibliometrics. Six distinct authorship patterns were recognized. The findings reveal men in first and last author positions constitute the highest research articles and citations indicating male authors to be more influential compared to females. Additionally, the study findings have provided an overview of the current state of women in library and information science research and highlighted areas where improvements can be made. © 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
  • Item type:Publication,
    Brief communication Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research Open PDF 
    (2006)
    Peñas, C.S.
    ;
    Willett, P.
    An analysis is presented of the publications by, and citations to, 57 male and 48 female academics in five departments of librarianship and information science. After taking account of differences in subject and differences in numbers of academics, it is shown that male academics publish significantly more papers on average than do female authors, but that there is no significant difference in the numbers of citations to published papers. © CILIP.
  • Item type:Publication,
    Gender Disparity Among Indian Library and Information Science Professionals: a 20-year sample of publications from 1999-2018
    (2020)
    Parabhoi, L.
    ;
    Sahu, R.R.
    ;
    Dewey, R.S.
    ;
    Parabhoi, D.
    Gender disparity is present in many research fields including in Library and Information Science (LIS). This paper studied gender disparity among Indian LIS professionals and measure the intellectual output 20 years. The study reviewed 1,195 publications in the LIS field from 1999 to 2018, determining the gender of the first author. An analysis of the publication list determined the yearly contributions of male and female authors, together with the average distributions, yearly citation rates and other metrics, by gender. Across the whole study period, publications first-authored by men outnumbered those by women. Similarly, overall contributions by men were higher than by women. BM Gupta and M Tripathi were the most prolific male and female authors, respectively. "India" was the most common keyword used by both first author genders. “Bibliometrics”, “Digital Library”, “Scientometrics”, “Academic Libraries”, “E-resources” and “web 2.0” were the core research areas of both men and women. When journals were divided into national and international scope, articles by men outnumbered those by women on both levels. However, 65% of the articles published by women were in international journals, compared to 58% of the articles published by men (59% overall), suggesting that the quality of work produced by women was comparable to or higher than the quality of work published by men. Consequently, gender parity in Indian LIS publications may be some way off. As such, further research is required to highlight and mitigate the issues experienced by women in academia in order to increase productivity in the LIS field in India. © 2020, Library Philosophy and Practice.All Rights Reserved.
  • Item type:Publication,
    Reflections and contemplations of women professionals’ contributions: Impressions of recent research in the journal of documentation Open PDF 
    (2021)
    Awasthi, S.
    ;
    Sukula, S.K.
    Literary history and libraries’ progress are evident of women professionals’ contributions. Since the beginning, women professionals’ roles and responsibilities in different capacities have been quite phenomenal. The present study highlights the contributions published in the Journal of Documentation for the period 2015-2019. It attempts to study the variations existing in research output from a gender perspective and a brief review of women professionals’ journey and job-related aspects from traditional to contemporary times. The information is collected from the Journal of Documentation (JoD). The study focuses on the year-wise distribution of articles and authors, collaboration patterns among the gender, authorship pattern, geographical distribution, the annual growth rate of female contributors, and average productivity of male and female authors per article. The findings revealed that the annual growth rate of the female contributors was 28.6 in 2019. The male author’s average productivity per article is 1.23, and 1.12 is the female contributors’ average productivity per paper. The study is beneficial in understanding the women’s contributions in international journals, and it has also revealed that the publication gap is not huge. Still, it is minimal except in a few circumstances. © 2021, DESIDOC.