English
Italiano
Log In(current)
Repository logoRepository logo
Who We Are✱Collections✱News and Events✱Contacts
  1. Home
  2. PUBBLICAZIONE/PUBLICATION
  3. Journal Article
  4. COVID-19 and the gender gap in research productivity: understanding the effect of having primary responsibility for the care of children
  • Details

COVID-19 and the gender gap in research productivity: understanding the effect of having primary responsibility for the care of children

Publication type
journal article
Publication date
2023
Author(s)
Peetz, D.
Preston, A.
Walsworth, S.
Weststar, J.
Language
English
Discipline(s)

Covid-19

Geographical area

Australia

Canada

Abstract
In this paper we contribute to the emerging literature on the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the gender gap in research productivity. We extend previous studies by considering men and women academics from science and non-science disciplines through an analysis of data from academics at 14 universities across two countries (seven in Australia and seven in Canada) and focusing on the role of primary caregiving. Our empirical approach used logistic regressions and the Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition technique. The latter enabled us to ask: ‘How much of the gender gap in perceived productivity during the pandemic is due to gender differences in primary care responsibilities?’ Within the sample (N = 2,817) of academics, 33% of women and 25% of men reported that their perceived publication ability decreased a lot during the pandemic. This is an eight percentage-point gender gap in perceived publication ability. Statistical analysis revealed that two-fifths (40%) of this gap may be explained by gender differences in having primary responsibility for the care of children. Gender differences in other characteristics such as age, discipline, and increased teaching and administrative work were not, as a group, significant. There were also no differences between Australia and Canada. The findings are important, particularly for the pursuit of gender equality within academia. In the absence of specific mitigating interventions, research disruptions in 2020 may have long-lasting career scarring effects (e.g. hiring, promotion, tenure) and, as a result, see women further disadvantaged within the academy. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Journal
Studies in Higher Education
ISSN
1470-174X
DOI
10.1080/03075079.2023.2201589
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pagination
1428-1439
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85153373057&doi=10.1080%2f03075079.2023.2201589&partnerID=40&md5=561446e415e6d4097c715de29308a1f9
https://libkey.io/libraries/2561/articles/567585862/full-text-file?utm_source=api_2667&allow_speedbump=true
Repository logo
Sistema Bibliotecariodi Ateneo SBA
gendermore@unimore.it
www.sba.unimore.it
Privacy policy
End User Agreement
Send Feedback

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
Repository logo COAR Notify